image image image image image image image
White House News
White House Cabinet
U.S. State Government Links
Senator Gordon Smith
Congressman Greg Walden
Federal Resources
Federal News
Federal Legislation
Find Elected Officials
Find Your Legislator
Write Elected Officials
MegaVote
Federal Register
Oregon News
News From Klamath Falls
OR State Agency Updates
OR Dept of Agriculture
ODA "Story of the Week"
Oregon District Maps
Find Your Legislator
Paulettes Political Notes
At Witts End
Legislative News
Guest Commentaries
Resource Links
Legislative Questions
Healthy Forest Information
Healthy Forest News
Law and Court Links
Litigation and Court Updates
Find Your Legislator
Find Elected Officials
Write Elected Officials
USDA and Farm Programs
ESA Information
Oregon Senate
Oregon House
Committee Schedules
Bills and Laws
Initiatives/Measures
Legislative News
Legislative Information
OFS History
OFS Board of Directors
Maps and Directions
Contact OFS
OFS Archives
Privacy Policy
Website Directory
Support OFS


Paulette's Political Notes

Continued from page 1..


President Bush's Line-Item Veto Legislation Is Constitutional

President Bush's Line-Item Veto Legislation Meets Constitutional Requirements.  The Supreme Court struck down the 1996 version of the line-item veto because the Court concluded that it unconstitutionally permitted the President to unilaterally change a law passed by the Congress.  Under President Bush's proposal, when the President determines that an earmark or spending provision is wasteful or unnecessary, he can send it back to Congress, and Congress is then required to hold a prompt up-or-down vote on whether to retain the targeted spending. 

The Line-Item Veto Will Address The Central Dilemma Created By Unwarranted Earmarks.  When Members of Congress are faced with an important bill that includes wasteful spending tacked on by their colleagues, they have two bad options.  Either they vote against the whole bill, including all the worthwhile spending, or they vote for the whole bill, including the wasteful spending.  When such a bill comes to the President, he is left with the same bad choice – either he vetoes the whole thing, or he signs it with all the wasteful spending intact. 

Ø      A Line-Item Veto Offers A Smarter Way To Handle Taxpayer Dollars.  With a line-item veto, the President could approve the spending that is necessary, redline the spending that is not, and send the wasteful spending back to the Congress for an up-or-down vote. 

Ø      By Passing Line-Item Veto Legislation, Congress Would Make Lawmakers Think Twice Before Trying To Sneak A Wasteful Project Into A Bill.  When legislators know that their projects may be held up for closer public scrutiny, it discourages them from proposing this spending in the first place.

At The State Level, 43 Governors Already Have A Line-Item Veto, And They Are Almost Evenly Divided Between Democrats And Republicans.  Governors from both parties use their line-item authority to restrain wasteful spending in their state budgets. 

The Line-Item Veto Also Has Bipartisan Support In Congress.  Thirty-five Democrats joined more than 200 Republicans in the House to pass the line-item veto last week.  The Line-Item Veto now pending in the Senate also has bipartisan support, with Senator John Kerry as a cosponsor of the legislation.  By coming together to pass this important reform, Congress will bring discipline to the budget process.  


 

 

 

PAST
 COLUMNS
can be found on the
OFS Archives page


 

 

This Site was
"Made in the USA"
 

HOME :: FAQs ::  Archives :: Site Directory
Copyright © 2002-2003 C & A Consulting