image image image image image image image
White House News
White House Cabinet
U.S. State Government Links
Senator Gordon Smith
Congressman Greg Walden
Federal Resources
Federal News
Federal Legislation
Find Elected Officials
Find Your Legislator
Write Elected Officials
MegaVote
Federal Register
Oregon News
News From Klamath Falls
OR State Agency Updates
OR Dept of Agriculture
ODA "Story of the Week"
Oregon District Maps
Find Your Legislator
Paulettes Political Notes
At Witts End
Legislative News
Guest Commentaries
Resource Links
Legislative Questions
Healthy Forest Information
Healthy Forest News
Law and Court Links
Litigation and Court Updates
Find Your Legislator
Find Elected Officials
Write Elected Officials
USDA and Farm Programs
ESA Information
Oregon Senate
Oregon House
Committee Schedules
Bills and Laws
Initiatives/Measures
Legislative News
Legislative Information
OFS History
OFS Board of Directors
Maps and Directions
Contact OFS
OFS Archives
Privacy Policy
Website Directory
Support OFS


At Witt's End...

Continued from page 1...

According to the Mayo Clinic, no medical or scientific data demonstrates organic produce to be safer or more nutritious than conventionally grown food. A number of European organizations support that assessment, including the Food Standards Agency, the French Food Safety Agency and the Swedish National Food Administration. They all conclude there is no difference in food safety and nutrition between organic and conventional. Good old-fashioned marketing and advertising have made organic food what it is today: the all-purpose salve for what ails Americans.

Lu's study demonstrates fruits and vegetables are safe for people of all ages to consume, no matter how produced. The research shows that health risks associated with conventional fruits and vegetables is zero. More important, his study shows that just because you can count something doesn't mean it counts. Infinitesimal levels of all kinds of chemicals exist in all human bodies. "Detectable" levels of radiation exist all around us. But none of those represents a threat to human health -- at least not according to scientists who actually have researched the subject.

In the P-I's meritorious efforts to improve public health for all, perhaps a more useful focus would be the primary source of toxins in adults and children: the more than 150 chemicals found in the typical American home. If you're looking for regular and significant exposure to toxic chemicals, check out laundry detergent, plastics, cleaners, tobacco, cosmetics, shampoos, lotions and even children's toys. Research has demonstrated the threat posed by chemicals in those widely used products. It has not demonstrated any health risk from eating fruits and vegetables.

The truth is, U.S. life expectancy has been climbing for some time in part because of the increasing affordability and availability of fruits and vegetables. Keep in mind that the life expectancy curve precedes the aggressive marketing of organic produce. In addition, U.S. cancer rates are leveling off or declining across the board. Again one reason cited is better dietary choices that include more fruits and vegetables. The cancer-decline curve also predates the wildly successful marketing of organic products.



(continued on next page)
 

                 



 







PAST
 COLUMNS
can be found on the
OFS Archives page


 


 

 


This Site was
"Made in the USA"
 



HOME :: FAQs :: Site Directory
Copyright © 2002-2003 Web Design By C & A